20120229

Screen Shot

One would think that the rambunctiously enthusiastic dog would be the reason I need to replace the screening on my back porch door at regular intervals, but no. The innocent-looking cat that spends most of the day sleeping and her claws are the culprit! I've replaced the screen three times in the last two years, and two of the three times, kitty "klaw" tears were the reason the screen broke. Yes, Piglette did break one when she was a puppy, but she's learned to paw at the door frame instead of the screen (hence the brown spot in the photo - I'd rather have to clean and touch up paint than replace a screen).



So this past weekend, I built a little frame out of scrap wood I have lying around (you'd have to see my scrap wood piles to truly appreciate how much junk my family hoards) that fits inside the bottom portion of the door frame opening. I originally intended for it to divide the door screening into smaller portions, so I'd only have to replace the bottom where Gigi scratches. But now I think plexiglass in the frame is a better long-term option -- sturdier and easier to clean, and the top portion will still be screened for air flow. I just have to figure out how I'd attach the plexiglass.

Unfortunately, I ran out of patience to build another frame for the door on the left, so my doors no longer match. I'd like to think that the effect is whimsical, which suits my personality more, but in my heart I know that's a bald-faced lie!

By the way, it may seem as though I've abandoned my blog, but I try to visit others and say hello or leave a comment or two. It's just been difficult for me to sit down and organize my thoughts into anything writeable for the past year.

First, serving on the board of an animal welfare charity was challenging. Small charities are often led by people who feel strongly about "the cause" but are not necessarily those with strong leadership skills. Personal feelings, rather than duty to put the organization first, have a disproportionate influence on decision-making, which can put the whole organization at risk. Going in, it's easy to think you'll be the one who will be able to use reason to move things in a positive direction. When my one year term came due, I bowed out of a second term.

Dissatisfied with raising heck in the animal welfare domain, I rejoined the ranks of my neighborhood association (I was secretary of the umbrella organization that provided a unified voice for all neighborhood groups in my city, back in the day) and began battling city hall over the implementation of wobblette (can be charged as either an infraction or misdemeanor) statutes, which are based on the wobblers (can be charged as either a felony or misdemeanor) in the California state code. The problem is not necessarily in the spirit of the law, but in the letter, which is inadequate (I think) in providing checks and balances in the implementation. The proviso was added that the city attorney prepare an annual report of results and the city attorney promised to provide more detail with regard to how he plans to implement it. A short-term win as long as he remains in that position, but who knows long-term.

Given the last two paragraphs, you'd think there'd be something interesting to write about crazy animal welfare people and potential abuse of power. But the first topic was taboo, because my first responsibility was the welfare of the organization while I was on the board, and writing about it while still caught up in it was a bad idea. The second issue just sucked up a lot of time -- I'm not a lawyer, so had to do a lot of background research around a part-time job and consulting efforts, and maintain communications with the three city council members who bothered to reply, the city attorney and the neighorhood associations. All this said, I am still somewhat at a loss for words in general right now, and though I will be posting on occasion, it won't be regularly.

13 comments:

  1. It's so nice to read you again :-).

    But really: what is a wobbler? Wobblette? I found different definitions in the online dict I use but nothing seems to fit :-(

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you, Martina :)

    A search for California and wobbler may yield something useful, as I think they are unique to the state. Generally, criminal statutes in the USA define the nature of a crime, its severity (whether it's a felony, misdemeanor or infraction), and the punishment. In California, we have wobblers, so the statutes define what a crime is, but rather than also defining how severe the crime is, law enforcement is granted the power to decide the severity with which they will charge the crime.

    What the statutes don't do is define a process for implementation. In which cases will the more serious charges be pressed? What will be the escalation pattern for multiple offenders? Individual prosecutors decide this in their own individual jurisdictions, and their processes are not guaranteed to be either consistent or transparent.

    At the city level, they are called wobblettes, because any offense may "wobble" between a misdemeanor and an infraction, rather than the more severe felony and misdemeanor choice. Many cities have already changed their statutes to match the state's, and many without the knowledge of their citizens, because these types of changes are usually reported in city council agendas on city websites and if they make any news, it's usually the local paper... and relatively few people read local papers anymore!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ah, now it's my time to thank you. Even as I read the wikipedia article about Hybrid Offence your explanation made it much more clear.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You're welcome, Martina. I think lawyers write laws in a confusing manner specifically so that normal people will pay them a lot of money to interpret them.

    Hi Tim :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Good to see you post again! As for the way laws are written, I agree that they are ridiculously convoluted and wordy. I'm still trying to grasp the most basic ones that apply to my job.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Group efforts never turn out the way one envisioned they would. But, group effort often turns out better than expected because of the diverse talent brought to bear. Your volunteer animal welfare effort is something to be proud of.

    As for the California Criminal Justice System, didn't it fail the public and law abiding citizens long ago? At least that is what I hear from neighbors who have fled California, seeking a safe place to raise their families.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I live in the 'burbs, Walter, where crime rates remain low. That is one advantage we have over the cities!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm in the throes of arranging a charity gig with local bands for Canine Partners (dogs that help the disabled) and found it's a draining process so I can partly sympathise.

    Nice to see you back!

    ReplyDelete
  9. You're doing a great thing, Helena. Nice to see you, too.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Certainly glad I finally got here. Blogging has been difficult for me the past few months, but hope to change that come May. Glad to hear you are keeping yourself so busy. I did the neighborhood gig for a long time. Taught me quite a bit. I had hoped it would teach me to be more diplomatic. I think I am hopeless in that venture.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Tact is overrated, anyway, Julie. Candor may not always be appreciated, but at least people don't need to guess about where you stand.

    ReplyDelete